🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a bill increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," commented one European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on robust data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring adult authorization for minors to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

Even as this global debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.