🔗 Share this article

A number of Fortnite players are feeling let down, and this isn't due to the latest in-game events. The game's newest limited-time event, that introduces a Springfield map, also unveiled a fresh feature called pets. It's impossible to ignore that the latest companions are adorable. However, the attached costs have made numerous fans shocked at the developer's attempts to profit from nearly every part of the gaming experience.

Understanding Sidekicks?

Sidekicks are essentially like digital creatures, but with some limitations. You can give them a name, and they will accompany you throughout a match. They are indestructible, and you can pet them. Other players outside your party cannot see sidekicks — and displaying one's companions is arguably a big part of the enjoyment of owning them. Sidekicks can be outfitted with costumes and emotes, but the debate centers on their appearance. Each sidekick's overall design is only able to be changed one time, after which that selection becomes final. You can choose a companion's coat color, accent hues, eye colors, markings, and its build size.

The Expensive Customization System

Should a player later decide that you want your sidekick to appear slightly altered, you cannot simply continue to modify its look. Players must purchase a new companion. Furthermore, these pets aren't inexpensive. Most people are obtaining the banana-themed sidekick, because it's packaged with the current battle pass. Based on leaks, upcoming sidekicks may be priced at from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; for reference, 1,000 V-Bucks costs $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks are $22.99. You can rename a companion as many times as they want.

Community Response and Comparisons

The majority of pets have not been officially released yet, so the cost may well change. Yet regardless of whether the company makes companions cheaper, much of the anger stems from the fact that players could need to spend for a one type of sidekick more than once. For some, the cost structure seems particularly unfair considering the developer has already added companions that are carried around as part of back blings. Backpack companions lack a customization limitation and can be seen by fellow players in the game. Backpack buddies cannot be given a name or perform gestures, but other gamers are able to sometimes engage with them — and this is more favorable than remaining unseen completely.

The absence of unique features and restricted interaction options have numerous players experiencing underwhelmed. For instance, why is it not possible to a player, for example, play fetch with their fancy fruit-themed pet? Some note that companions sometimes fail to stay close with the player if a match is moving quickly, or mention that the banana pet takes up two slots in the reward system — and this supports the idea that the company is pressuring the community for revenue. Greedy is a word that's coming up frequently in such conversations, with a number of likening sidekick pricing to similar intense pricing schemes in games like popular sports games. Additionally, it adds to the issue that certain sidekicks are projected to be more expensive than equivalent character skin versions.

"We urge you to avoid purchasing Companion Pets," pleads a popular online thread that encourages other gamers to proverbially vote with their wallets.

"We understand they're adorable," the thread continues, "we realize they're fun. We are aware everyone has been anticipating them. But the monetization focus being shown is disgusting and should not be rewarded."

The Bigger Context of Virtual Purchases

Over the past few years, the game's special occasions and collaborations have grown in scope and ambition, but the free-to-play game continues to needs to generate income. As such, the total quantity of items users are able to currently purchase has grown nearly excessive. Beyond standard items like back accessories, deployment tools, pickaxes, and gestures, players might possibly spend cash on shoes, songs, instruments, building blocks, vehicles, tires, custom paint jobs, seasonal rewards, and a subscription. Companion pets do not just cost money, and also bring in a host of new revenue avenues for the company. It is likely, users will before long be in a position to pay for items like sidekick looks, costumes, gestures, and further engagement options.

All of these cosmetics are entirely voluntary and unneeded to have fun with the experience, but gear can still influence a player's community experience. Kids, for example, sometimes encounter teasing for not wearing impressive sufficiently cool outfits. A comparable situation previously transpired when the developer introduced licensed kicks, which can range from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The footwear pricing scheme was not well received either, and some players vowed that they wouldn't succumb to the pressure back then. But ultimately, buying shoes grew commonplace. Today, companion pets are additionally pushing the limits of how much a gamer could be prepared to pay to stand out amongst the crowd.

What's Ahead for Companion Pets?

Pets are still a relatively new feature, and they're part of a game that changes regularly. Some players are reporting that they have received a survey that gauges how people feel about pet functionality and monetization, which could potentially indicate that the developer's strategy are still subject to change. Yet if Fortnite footwear are a sign, sidekicks likely won't become cheaper overall — there will just be a broader range of prices to choose from.

Ultimately, while some individuals are raging at Fortnite shop prices, others are experiencing only happiness for their battle royale friends.