🔗 Share this article

US government attorneys have claimed that a Libyan national individual willingly confessed to being involved in operations directed at Americans, encompassing the 1988 Lockerbie incident and an unsuccessful conspiracy to target a American government official using a explosive-laden overcoat.

Admission Information

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is reported to have confessed his role in the murder of 270 victims when Pan Am 103 was brought down over the Scottish community of the region, during interrogation in a Libya's detention facility in 2012.

Known as the suspect, the elderly man has stated that multiple disguised persons forced him to make the statement after threatening him and his relatives.

His attorneys are trying to stop it from being used as proof in his legal proceedings in Washington in 2025.

Judicial Dispute

In answer, attorneys from the American justice department have said they can demonstrate in the courtroom that the statement was "unforced, reliable and correct."

The availability of the suspect's alleged statement was first revealed in 2020, when the United States stated it was accusing him with creating and priming the IED used on Pan Am 103.

Defense Assertions

The defendant is accused of being a ex- colonel in Libyan intelligence agency and has been in US custody since 2022.

He has stated not guilty to the accusations and is scheduled to stand trial at the District Court for the the capital in spring.

His legal team are attempting to prevent the jury from hearing about the confession and have filed a petition asking for it to be withheld.

They argue it was secured under pressure following the uprising which overthrew Colonel Gaddafi in 2011.

Claimed Coercion

They say former members of the ruler's regime were being singled out with unlawful murders, kidnappings and torture when Mas'ud was seized from his home by hostile individuals the subsequent period.

He was transported to an informal detention center where other detainees were purportedly beaten and harmed and was isolated in a cramped cell when several hooded individuals presented him a single sheet of paper.

His attorneys stated its handwritten information started with an instruction that he was to acknowledge to the Pan Am Flight 103 attack and a separate terror attack.

Substantial Terrorist Incidents

The defendant asserts he was instructed to remember what it said about the incidents and repeat it when he was interrogated by another person the next day.

Being concerned for his security and that of his children, he stated he thought he had no option but to comply.

In their reply to the defense's request, legal counsel from the US Department of Justice have declared the court was being requested to withhold "highly significant proof" of Mas'ud's culpability in "multiple significant terror attacks targeting American people."

Prosecution Responses

They claim the defendant's version of occurrences is unconvincing and inaccurate, and contend that the details of the admission can be corroborated by reliable independent proof gathered over many periods.

The prosecutors state Mas'ud and other previous officials of the former leader's intelligence service were kept in a hidden prison operated by a militia when they were interviewed by an seasoned Libya's law enforcement official.

They assert that in the disorder of the post-uprising time, the center was "the protected environment" for Mas'ud and the other operatives, given the conflict and opposition sentiment dominant at the period.

Interrogation Particulars

According to the police officer who questioned the suspect, the facility was "well run", the inmates were not restrained and there were no indications of torture or pressure.

The official has said that over 48 hours, a confident and healthy Mas'ud described his involvement in the explosions of the aircraft.

The federal authorities has also asserted he had admitted building a device which detonated in a Berlin venue in the mid-1980s, claiming the lives of several individuals, comprising multiple US soldiers, and injuring dozens more.

Further Claims

He is also said to have detailed his involvement in an conspiracy on the safety of an unnamed American foreign minister at a state funeral in the Asian country.

The defendant is alleged to have explained that someone accompanying the US official was carrying a rigged coat.

It was the suspect's mission to trigger the device but he opted not to act after learning that the person carrying the item did not realize he was on a suicide mission.

He opted "not to activate the device" despite his superior in the secret service being present at the time and questioning what was {going on|happening|occurring